Chapter 6 - What the Booth Could Prove

Evelyn Shaw began her review by separating three questions that had become tangled together.
What had happened at the Barcelona congress?
What had the sponsors told investors afterward?
And had the investors committed funds because of a description they would not otherwise have accepted?
She did not ask Elena to solve all three.
"You are a witness to a limited event," she told her during a meeting attended by Tessa. "I don't expect you to know what happened in private boardrooms."
Elena found that reassuring. Samir had seemed to assume that she possessed a complete record of his actions. Her old notebook contained nothing of the sort.
It recorded an assignment, some terminology, and fragments of a conversation that reached her through the interpretation system during a break.
She explained how the equipment worked. Interpreters wore headphones and listened through assigned channels. During formal sessions, sound from the speakers reached the booth. During breaks, technicians usually switched those channels off or rerouted them.
On the afternoon she remembered, voices had continued to reach her after the session ended.
"Did you move closer to listen?" Evelyn asked.
"No. I remained at my station. When I realized the feed was still live, I alerted the supervisor."
"Did you make a recording?"
"No."
"Did you understand the entire conversation?"
"No. Only the part I heard."
Evelyn asked whether the notebook had been altered since the congress.
Elena said it had not. She described how she used dated notebooks in her freelance work and agreed to let Tessa arrange a documented inspection rather than surrender the original without a receipt.
Marta Vidal, the Barcelona coordinator, provided an authenticated assignment confirmation and a technical incident record directly to Evelyn through the agency's approved procedure. The report showed that an interpretation channel remained active for several minutes during the break and that Elena had alerted the supervisor.
It contained no recording of the conversation.
That distinction mattered.
The report supported Elena's opportunity to hear the men. It did not independently establish the words they had spoken.
Evelyn made no claim beyond that.
Samir's lawyers took a different approach. They argued that the consultation had been informal, that early drafts were common, and that Elena's recollection after two years was unreliable. Those were questions a fair review had to consider.
But they also sent the hotel a notice suggesting Elena had disclosed confidential information to investors.
Nina Park called Elena into her office.
"I don't believe you should lose work because a guest is embarrassed," she said. "But our legal team is asking for the paperwork before we assign you to another event involving his company."
"Does that mean I'm suspended?"
"No. Your other shifts remain. I'll keep you informed."
Elena thanked her and returned to the floor, but the conversation left her uneasy.
The hotel was not her only source of income, and interpreting had taught her to manage irregular work. Even so, she needed dependable hours. Her mother was recovering well, yet the practical needs that had brought Elena back to Chicago hadn't disappeared because a wealthy man felt threatened.
Later that evening, Samir appeared at the hotel's public lounge. He did not approach the service station. Instead, he waited until Elena was walking toward the staff corridor and spoke from several steps away.
"Ms. Ruiz. One minute."
She stopped where other employees could see them.
"My attorney has asked me not to discuss Barcelona with you."
"That lawyer is making a small misunderstanding expensive," he said.
"I didn't hire your lawyer."
His expression tightened.
"You think I stole something. You don't understand the partners, the risks, or how those projects are built."
"I haven't accused you of stealing anything."
"Then tell the reviewer you misunderstood what you heard."
Elena looked at him carefully.
"Would that be true?"
He didn't answer immediately.
"It would save a great deal of trouble."
"For whom?"
Samir glanced toward the lobby, where guests were speaking with the concierge. His controlled voice lowered.
"People work at that freight project. Families depend on it. If financing stops, real people get hurt."
"Then they deserve to know the money was arranged honestly."
For an instant, his face showed the same alarm she had seen in the ballroom. Then he turned away.
Elena wrote a dated account of the encounter and sent it to Tessa. She did not pursue him.
The following day, the oversight committee voted to pause the next unspent financing draw while Evelyn examined the origin of the recommendation. Money already placed in an operations reserve remained available for existing payroll and safety obligations. The committee wanted to avoid punishing workers for a dispute over sponsor representations.
Javier was relieved by that distinction, but he was not comfortable. He had trusted Samir, introduced him to investors, and presented the project as carefully reviewed. Now he had to explain why some of his assurances could no longer be supported.
"I should have asked for the comparison," he told Evelyn.
"Yes," she said. "But the question now is whether the missing comparison was an oversight or part of the structure itself."
She had requested the archive of drafts exchanged among Samir's company, Nabil's financing office, and the project administrator. The agreements required those records to be retained for audit.
The first production arrived incomplete.
Several attachments were listed in the correspondence index, but the files themselves were missing.
Evelyn returned the production with a formal deficiency notice.
May you like
One of the absent attachments was named in the September email Javier had already uncovered.
It was the working paper from which the post-congress recommendation appeared to have been written.