Chapter 5 - The Payment Nobody Received

The electronic-signature record changed the nature of the dispute. Until then, Nora had been trying to establish that her artwork was being used without a production license. Now she had to address a document that purported to sell away her rights. If the assignment was genuine, Victoria's company might have been entitled to use the print. If it wasn't, the company had to explain why it relied on paperwork created through an address Nora had never controlled.

Amara arranged a meeting with the company's outside lawyer, a reserved man named Philip Grant. Nora joined the call from her apartment, seated at the drafting table where she had painted the original design. A folder of dated drawings lay beside her laptop. She had brought the same careful attention to this meeting that she brought to preparing a textile repeat: every line needed to connect to the next.

Grant said the company had paid for the assignment in good faith. He produced a confirmation showing the stipulated amount transferred to a bank account on the day after the alleged signing. The account holder's name was not visible on the excerpt he supplied.

“I never received that money,” Nora said.

“The records indicate payment,” Grant replied.

“They indicate a transfer. They don't show that I received it.”

Amara asked for the beneficiary details and the complete signature audit. She also requested that the company preserve its internal messages concerning the artwork and the planned launch. Grant said he would discuss the requests with his client. He stopped short of accusing Nora of dishonesty, but he also refused to acknowledge that the assignment might be false.

After the call, Nora sat with her hands flat on the table. The supposed payment was large enough to cover many months of rent. She could almost understand why someone unfamiliar with her finances might assume she would have accepted it. But it wasn't the amount that troubled her most. The evaluation agreement had been negotiated through her actual email address. Every invoice she had sent used that address. The assignment had gone somewhere else. Nobody had asked why.

Amara explained that the false address and unexplained bank account could support a claim of impersonation, but they also raised questions about who had created the transaction. The lawyer could not treat Victoria's knowledge as established merely because Victoria owned the label. Nora wanted someone held responsible. Amara wanted to identify that person accurately.

There was another problem. The collection was sponsored by two large retailers, both expecting access to exclusive fabric designs after the launch. They had paid deposits and prepared promotional materials. Removing the blue-and-silver pieces would disrupt orders beyond one evening's runway presentation. The business pressure to declare the assignment legitimate was substantial.

That afternoon, June confirmed that the disputed garments remained on the separate rack. The finishing team had been instructed to complete the rest of the collection first. Nora thanked her, then told her to stop looking for more evidence. June had already given a statement about the labels. Nora did not want her searching through company files or risking another unpaid invoice.

At the restaurant, meanwhile, Helen called Nora with an update about the security recording. A copy from the dining-room camera had been preserved. It showed Victoria scattering bills, Nora placing them on the tray, and the manager gripping Nora's upper arm before she swatted his hand away. There was no audio from that camera, so the recording did not establish every word spoken. But it contradicted the manager's written report, which described Nora as the first person to become physically aggressive.

Helen had spoken with Lena and other staff members. She said the restaurant would review the dismissal and the manager's conduct, and she offered to meet Nora with a representative of her choosing. Nora asked for the recording to be retained and for her earned wages to be paid on time. She was not yet ready to discuss returning to work.

The two disputes seemed different in scale. One involved an expensive fashion launch and a questionable assignment; the other involved a customer's humiliation of an employee earning a shift wage. But Nora recognized the same assumption in both: someone with more power could write the official version of what happened and expect everyone else to accept it.

That evening, Amara received a more complete signature audit. The invitation had been sent to the false email address from an administrator account used by Victoria's sample department. The system recorded a successful signing within minutes. The access location matched the network used by the company's offices. Those details did not identify a human signer, but they made the claim that Nora had signed from her own device increasingly difficult to defend.

Grant also supplied a partial payment record. The beneficiary account had been opened under a name resembling Nora's, with one extra middle initial she did not possess. Amara asked the company to explain what verification had been performed before a substantial payment was sent to a new account. No satisfactory answer came that night.

The first major answer arrived the following morning in the form of a letter from the company's finance director. The department had flagged the beneficiary account as new when the transfer was arranged. A staff member had raised the mismatch between Nora's original invoice details and the account attached to the assignment. The concern was recorded, then cleared by a senior approval originating in Victoria's office. The finance director would not name the individual until counsel completed an internal review.

Nora read the letter twice. For the first time, she saw how the separate pieces fitted together: the substituted address, the new bank account, the signature, and the instruction to remove credit labels. The false document had not simply appeared in a file. It had passed through steps where people could have stopped and asked questions. Instead, somebody had instructed them to proceed.

Amara warned her that an approval from Victoria's office was not necessarily Victoria's personal order. “We know the review was overridden,” she said. “Now we need to know who had authority to do that.”

Nora closed the folder and looked toward the unfinished illustrations on her worktable. She had accepted a sampling fee because she believed a small company could treat her fairly if the terms were in writing. The paper had protected her rights on its face. Someone else had treated that protection as something to work around.

May you like

[COMPLETED] “GET YOUR HANDS OFF MY DRESS! YOU’RE NOTHING BUT AN OLD SEAM...

[COMPLETED] At the Mafia Boss's Engagement Party, I Served His Hungry So...

[COMPLETED] The Mafia Boss’s Fiancée Tried to Dismiss His Father’s Loyal...

A message arrived from Grant before the afternoon ended. His client had agreed not to release the disputed textile pieces or distribute their promotional photographs while the documentation was investigated. It was a meaningful temporary victory. Yet beneath the agreement was a troubling detail: the company still intended to proceed with the broader retail publicity campaign and had not withdrawn its claim that it owned the artwork.

Nora understood the contradiction. Someone was willing to stop using the print for a few hours. No one was yet willing to say why its ownership had been represented falsely in the first place.