Chapter 7 - The Instruction Behind the Assignment

The next morning, Amara received the preserved messages from Marianne's lawyer through a formal exchange with the company's counsel. There were original email files, not just screenshots. They contained the sequence of questions that Marianne had described, including message identifiers and delivery information the company's technical staff could examine. No single record solved the case alone. Together, they told a story the forged-looking assignment had been designed to conceal.

The first message came from Marianne, asking whether the artist had approved a full assignment. She explained that Nora's signed evaluation agreement required a separate production license and that no such consent appeared in the department's files. The response came from Victoria's executive office. It directed Marianne to prepare the transfer paperwork using the address supplied by that office and to complete the transaction before the launch materials were finalized.

Marianne asked again why Nora could not receive the invitation at the address she had always used. The reply was even more troubling: contacting Nora would delay the timetable, and the matter had already been approved at executive level. Marianne had then sent the signing invitation to the substituted account, believing someone higher in the company had handled the consent. She said she was uneasy but had not stopped the process.

That made her responsible for a decision she should have questioned. It did not establish that she had invented the plan. The next message connected the decision to Victoria personally. It was a reply from Victoria's own corporate account to the executive assistant who had prepared the address and payment instructions. Victoria wrote that the print was essential to the collection, that its creator was asking for terms the label would not accept, and that the launch would not be held up over a freelance contributor. She authorized the office to finish the paperwork and remove the supplier identification from the show garments.

Nora read the excerpt in Amara's office. She had expected anger. What she felt first was exhaustion. She remembered the money flying across the restaurant table, Victoria's assurance that she could prevent Nora from working in New York, and the manager reaching for her arm. Those incidents were not evidence of the contract scheme. But they had revealed how comfortable Victoria was with ordering other people to comply.

“Does it prove she knew the signature wasn't mine?” Nora asked.

“It proves she knew there was no ordinary agreement with you and that she approved a process keeping you out of it,” Amara said. “We need the remaining transaction records to establish who controlled the false account and where the payment went. Her lawyers will be given the opportunity to respond.”

There was another document. An internal production note explained why the tags had been left on the garments until the final fittings. The sample workshop needed to identify the artwork supplier for color matching and repeat alignment. Removing the tags too early would have caused practical problems for the finishers. Once the pieces were complete, the company intended to replace them with ordinary collection labels. June had observed the final step without knowing the earlier decisions that made it important.

The explanation connected the label photographs to the assignment and the artwork itself. June's images weren't mysterious evidence that had appeared at the perfect time. They were records of an ordinary manufacturing process made suspicious by an instruction to remove a creator's name after her permission had been bypassed.

Grant, Victoria's outside lawyer, asked for a meeting. He acknowledged that the messages raised serious concerns and said he was advising the company to suspend its assertion of ownership until the facts were established. The event sponsors were notified that the disputed print would not be presented, photographed for sale, or distributed under the existing paperwork. Those steps protected the immediate commercial situation. They did not excuse the conduct that had brought everyone there.

The payment trail also became clearer. The beneficiary account was controlled by a third-party business-service provider retained by Victoria's executive office. The provider had received instructions to open an account for a purported artist settlement. After the transfer, the money had been routed back through an expense account used by the same office. There was no evidence Nora had received any of it. Grant agreed that the transaction could no longer be cited as proof of payment to her. The company's auditors began an independent review.

Nora was careful not to equate that financial record with a criminal conviction. Amara told her the auditors would determine who had authorized each step and would refer suspected misconduct to the appropriate authorities if warranted. What Nora could now establish was enough for the immediate question: she had not licensed the print for production, and the document suggesting otherwise had been created through accounts she did not control.

Victoria requested to speak with Nora privately. Amara advised her not to attend without counsel. Nora declined the private invitation and offered to join a recorded meeting with both sides represented. Victoria did not accept at first. She sent a message instead, saying that the whole situation had been exaggerated and that all designers understood how the industry worked.

Nora read the message once. It was close to the argument Victoria had made over the dollar bills: the rules were whatever powerful people said they were, and everyone else should accept their place.

By evening, another message arrived, this one from the restaurant. Helen confirmed that Nora's final wages and accrued tips would be paid in full. The manager's physical contact and inaccurate report were being handled under the restaurant's disciplinary process. Lena's statement had been included. Helen asked whether Nora would consider coming in to discuss an employment settlement rather than returning to the dining room.

Nora set the restaurant message beside the correspondence from Amara. In both cases, the first official version of the conflict had favored someone with more influence. In both, a record and the willingness of other workers to speak had challenged that version. Yet Nora still had to decide what she wanted beyond proving herself right.

She turned toward the original textile hanging beside her drafting table. She had once imagined the print appearing on a runway with her name properly credited. Now the prospect of seeing it there seemed tied to humiliation and deception. She did not want revenge to become another way Victoria determined what happened to her work.

May you like

[COMPLETED] “GET YOUR HANDS OFF MY DRESS! YOU’RE NOTHING BUT AN OLD SEAM...

[COMPLETED] At the Mafia Boss's Engagement Party, I Served His Hungry So...

[COMPLETED] The Mafia Boss’s Fiancée Tried to Dismiss His Father’s Loyal...

That night, Amara called with one final update. Victoria had agreed to a formal meeting the following afternoon, with the disputed launch pieces still withheld and company representatives present. The questions about consent and payment would be addressed on the record.

Nora looked at the photographs of the original artwork before answering. She had spent the week being told to apologize, be quiet, or accept whatever powerful people had decided. This time she would be able to ask for the truth in a room where the answers could be preserved.